Razor Shark
- 2 published RTP configurations are on record for this game.
- The gap between its highest and lowest published RTP is 6.18 percentage points.
- Its RTP is 0.35 percentage points above the Push Gaming median.
- Its documented max win ranks in the top 3% of Push Gaming games we track.
Every documented RTP version
Each published version, with its theoretical cost and where the figure comes from. Cost is expected loss over the long run — not a session outcome.
| Version | Published RTP | House edge | Cost / $100 | Cost / $1,000 | Cost / $10,000 | Diff vs best | Source & confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Highest | 96.7% | 3.3% | $3.3 | $33 | $330 | — | Secondary sourceslot.report · checked 11 Jul 2026 |
| Lowest | 90.52% | 9.48% | $9.48 | $94.8 | $948 | +$618 | Source not yet documentedLegacy import — not independently confirmed · checked 11 Jul 2026 |
House edge = 100% − RTP. Theoretical cost = amount wagered × house edge. “Diff vs best” is the extra expected cost against the highest published version.
What the version choice costs you
Same reels, same art, same max win — only the maths changes. Here is the 96.7% version against the 90.52% version.
Over $10,000 wagered, the lowest published version is expected to cost about $618 more than the highest — a 6.18-point swing in house edge for the identical game.
The full record
Every field the provider publishes. A dash means the figure isn't published — we don't guess.
Why the RTP version matters
RTP is the single biggest lever on what a slot costs to play — and on a configurable game, the casino, not the studio, picks it.
Razor Shark carries Push Gaming’s name and identical artwork whichever version a casino licenses, but the published return can differ by whole percentage points. That difference is invisible in the lobby: the game looks the same, plays the same, and pays the advertised max win the same way. The only tell is the return-to-player line in the in-game rules.
At 96.7% the house keeps 3.3% of long-run turnover; at 90.52% it keeps 9.48%. That is why we surface every version we can document rather than a single number — the figure a lobby shows you is the one worth checking before you play, not after.
How the game works
The documented mechanics, from the game's own paytable and rules screen.
A 5×4 grid running 20 lines. Wins pay left to right on the published paylines.
Push Gaming rates it high volatility — expect longer gaps between bigger hits.
The advertised ceiling is 85,475× your stake — a theoretical maximum, reached rarely.
Features on record
The features the provider lists for this game. Each links to every slot in the database that shares it.
Where each figure comes from
Per key field: the source, the confidence, and when we last checked. We flag anything unverified instead of presenting it as certified.
Our read on the numbers
At its default 96.7%, Razor Shark sits 0.32 points above the 96.38% average of the 84 Push Gaming titles we track, and it beats 92.7% of the 2,808-slot database. That makes the default version an ordinary-to-fair return for the studio, but the story is the spread.
The number that should decide where you play is the $618 gap per $10,000 between the highest and lowest published versions. A casino running the 90.52% build isn’t offering the same game on better-looking terms — it’s the same game costing 6.18 points more. Confirm the RTP in the paytable before you commit a bankroll.
Razor Shark vs the Push Gaming catalogue
How this title sits inside the 84 Push Gaming slots in our database.
Razor Shark (96.7%) against the Push Gaming median (96.35%). See the full Push Gaming catalogue →
If you like this one
Closest matches by feature overlap and RTP — every row links to its own full record.
 Mystery MuseumPush Gaming | 96.58% | 17,500× | Push Gaming | 2020 | ||
 Jammin' JarsPush Gaming | 96.83% | — | Push Gaming | 2018 | ||
 Fat DracPush Gaming | 96.57% | 50,000× | Push Gaming | 2021 | ||
 Razor ReturnsPush Gaming | 96.55% | 100,000× | Push Gaming | 2023 | ||
 Retro SweetsPush Gaming | 96.49% | 10,000× | Push Gaming | 2024 | ||
 Tiki TumblePush Gaming | 96.49% | 18,278× | Push Gaming | 2018 |
What we've changed
Every recorded change to this game's data. No entry is invented — this is the provenance log.
- 11 Jul 2026RTP corroborated against slot.report (independent database); values agree.
- 11 Jul 2026Volatility rating corroborated against slot.report.
- 11 Jul 2026Razor Shark imported into the RTPBoss dataset with provider-published figures.
Where to play
Top-scored crypto casinos carrying most major providers. Catalog coverage varies — confirm the game is live before depositing.
18+ · Rankings use documented criteria, not commercial terms · Play responsibly
Common questions
What is the RTP of Razor Shark?
Razor Shark by Push Gaming is published in more than one RTP version. The highest on record is 96.7% and the lowest is 90.52%. The figure a casino runs depends on which licensed version it deploys — check the in-game paytable to confirm.
How much does the lower RTP version cost?
On the 90.52% version the house edge is 9.48% versus 3.3% on the 96.7% version. Over $10,000 wagered that is a difference of about $618 in expected cost — the same game, a different published setting.
How volatile is Razor Shark?
Push Gaming rates Razor Shark as high volatility. Individual sessions can swing far from the published RTP; the RTP is a long-run average, not a per-session expectation.
What is the max win in Razor Shark?
The advertised ceiling is 85,475× the stake. That is a theoretical maximum, not a typical or expected outcome.
RTP is a long-run average, never a guarantee for any session. Slots are entertainment, not income. 18+ only — set a budget you can afford to lose and never chase losses.