
Clash of the Beasts
— means the provider does not publish that figure; we don’t guess.
How Clash of the Beasts compares
At 95.74%, Clash of the Beasts sits 0.16pp below the 95.90% average of the 344 Red Tiger slots we track, and pays better than 14.4% of the full 2808-slot database. Every $100 wagered costs $4.26 in expectation. Red Tiger rates it medium volatility. The maximum win RTPBoss records is 1,286× the stake — a theoretical maximum.
Data status
Where each figure comes from and when we last checked it. We show provider-published values with their source, and flag anything unverified rather than presenting it as certified.
Where to play
Top-scored crypto casinos carrying most major providers. Catalog coverage varies — confirm the game is live before depositing.
18+ · Rankings use documented criteria, not commercial terms · Play responsibly
FAQ
What is the RTP of Clash of the Beasts?
95.74% is the figure recorded for Clash of the Beasts (independently corroborated) — inverted, a 4.26% house edge. RTPBoss currently records one documented RTP value for this game. That does not prove other operator or regional configurations do not exist — check the in-game paytable at your casino.
How volatile is Clash of the Beasts?
Red Tiger rates Clash of the Beasts as medium volatility. A medium volatility rating sits between the two extremes. It describes how the provider classifies the game, not the result or frequency of wins in any session.
What is the max win in Clash of the Beasts?
RTPBoss records a maximum win of 1,286× the stake for Clash of the Beasts (a legacy import) — the extreme tail of the outcome range, not a likely result.
Who made Clash of the Beasts?
The developer is Red Tiger, with a 2020 release.
Similar slots
| 96.14% | 1,706× | Red Tiger | 2016 | |||
| 96.23% | 1,447× | Red Tiger | 2016 | |||
| 96.22% | 1,544× | Red Tiger | 2016 | |||
| 96.21% | 1,400× | Red Tiger | 2016 | |||
| 96.2% | 1,000× | Red Tiger | 2017 | |||
| 96.16% | 1,010× | Red Tiger | 2016 |